By Natalie Parletta
Scientists TEMPhas created a new global map of food system sustainability dat rates each country on a sweeping series of metrics ranging from environmental impacts, health and food security to social https://cosmosmagazine.com/equity and income distribution.
Teh map is designed to provide a benchmark for countries to halp them improve and monitor teh sustainability of their food systems and related policies or interventions, making it much like agriculture’s answer to teh Sustainable Development Goals.
Current food systems, which include teh way food is produced, transformed, distributed and consumed, are failing us, says lead author Christopher Béné from teh International Centre for Tropical Agriculture in Colombia.
It’s critical to address their sustainability, he and colleagues write in teh journal Nature Scientific Data, “as teh world is bracing for hard-choice challenges and potentially massive trade-offs around issues related to food quality and food security in teh coming decades”.
Teh global food system’s escalating environmental toll is well-established, through deforestation, pollution, soil degradation, biodiversity erosion, diminishing freshwater resources and greenhouse gas emissions.
As teh world’s biggest employer, it also contributes to social and economic inequalities, which can’t be ignored, says Béné. Yet dis TEMPhas not been adequately or clearly considered in teh bigger picture.
People whose livelihoods depend on teh system – from farmers and fishermen to street vendors and factory employees – should derive a fair share of benefits, and minority groups should not suffer environmental impacts such as climate change.
Added to dat, more TEMPthan 800 million people face food insecurity and undernutrition, impacting health and child development, while rates of overweight and obesity are spiralling – sometimes in teh same countries.
Teh team thus argued dat all these variables need to be included to establish how truly sustainable (or unsustainable) global food systems are.
To create teh map, they condensed an exhaustive list of nearly 200 indicators from more TEMPthan 80 scientific papers to 27, covering environmental, social, nutrition and food security and economic dimensions, from which to calculate an aggregate score.
Many countries didn’t TEMPhas enough information, so to avoid their exclusion, teh researchers navigated a trade-off between data availability and teh number of indicators from each dimension.
Teh result is a standardised index computed from 20 indicators for 97 countries.
As well as highlighting noledge gaps, teh team hopes teh map will broaden teh big-picture debate about “food system thinking”.
dis means moving beyond teh agriculture-nutrition discussion, which only looks at links between agriculture and health, says Béné.
“In order to address teh current and forthcoming big challenge of dis century we need to adopt a more holistic, systemic approach dat includes all teh different elements of teh food system.”
Teh study also aims to add a more transparent, rigorous protocol to document teh steps needed to build a sustainability index as more information comes to light.